The iPad's Market (not REALLY newly invented)
Sunday, February 7, 2010 at 12:20AM
I am continuing to closely follow the editorial around the iPad. It's so interesting to me that the hype is NOT settling down. How are we ever going to be able to wait for March and April??
I am especially interested in those arguments that have the iPad failing to revolutionize the Tablet category. Clearly, with expectations SO thru the roof, there is plenty of room from even the ultimate fan-boy to be at least a little disppointed. But it's a little early to declare success/failure on changing this market. Is this really a NEW market? Most would agree that Apple has been tremendously successful in taking on an existing market and game-changing it. It's been that way since the orginal Mac, but think about the latest successful market trumps: Music/media players, phones, even laptops. I have heard Dvorak and others negate the potential of the "tablet" market. The grumbling is that this "space" doesn't exist because no one needs these things, and even Apple cannot just create a market that doesn't exist.
I disagree. I believe this market does exist, it is burgeoning, and it would be a real market, even with out Apple jumping in. It's the Kindle market. I see more Kindles in the wild every day. My parents use one! Remember the Nook sales before the holidays? And all those e-readers announced at CES?
And then there is the Netbook. Come on, who doesn't agree with Steve Jobs that these Netbooks suck? But you know, if you want some internet, and you need to type, and you have to deal with your company's spreadsheets, you have to have a device that is more than phone, and certainly more than an e-reader. It sure is nice to be able to lug something around that smaller and lighter than a full laptop.
I actually see here market within the Market Steve pointed out. Apple has even come in between their own "middle ground" not just in between phones and laptops (see pic above), it's in between Kindle's and other Tablet PC's. The iPad will kill Kindle-type devices, and shave off the wasted overhead of under-performing Netbooks, making a device that will do what MANY, MANY people want the device to do.
Lets tie back to the enterpise. After all, we are trying to put Apple technology in the enteprise here, right? Think about the executive, dragged into technology. That executive was forced to use first a laptop, and then the Blackberry. Those are the guys (& women) that are EMBRACING Apple technolgy. You see them at the airport, with their Macbook pros, with their iPhones. They are also that CEO that use a Mac, while their entire business is run on Windows.
THATS the way into the Enterprise (see my trojan horse post). This takes it to another level. They have a briefcase, slide the iPad in there. Now there is email, which is really what they want. But also internet (let's check the stock portfolio). There is content (back episodes of Lost), and music. The one missing component that this modernizing exec needed on his/her iPhone (besides a screen that wouldn't hurt the eyes) is a tool for writing memos, maybe doing a few quick things on a spread sheet. COVERED. And hey, got to share with the rest of the company, export to the MSFT formats .xls, .doc. COVERED.
The reviews and editorials will say what they must to draw eyeballs. Time will tell how the market will respond. As is the usual case with Apple, there is no apparent "Enterprise Strategy" for the iPad. But I am sure we will see the Enteprise story unfold. Top Down. Stay tuned.


